Topic > Hooters Case Study - 2259

Referring to the above argument, we wish to further justify why Hooters should not ban children after 9pm. Our three key arguments will help solidify the thinking around this and that's important because this is a decision that families should make, although in this case these are decisions that businesses could make. Our first argument is that it is not up to the restaurant, but to the family who goes to the restaurant to decide whether or not to bring their children. Our second argument is that the restaurant is on a mission to profit and not to limit who is served, regardless of time. Finally, our third argument is that we disagree with the ban because Hooters advertises itself as a neighborhood restaurant to go watch sports and have fun, so everyone should be welcome. Through these perspectives we have not limited Hooters to having any reason to impose bans on who is allowed to enter and exit the restaurant. The three people we interviewed were: Nicolette the hostess, Ashli ​​our waitress and Britany the manager. Each person was able to express their personal point of view based on the observations made and collaborated well with us. The location where this took place was the Hooters in Santa Monica on 4th Street, which is one of the most common locations in the area as on a slow afternoon we could see that it was still quite busy and many families were present.2. Summary OverviewHooters banning children from entering after 9pm can be easily reasoned, but what needs to be remembered is what kind of place Hooters is. It is a neighborhood restaurant that meets the needs of many people. There are TVs everywhere playing sports games and there... half of paper..., and even with the 9pm ban, they might see Hooters as losing their edge when it comes to serving families. The other effect is to run the risk of not complying with the ban and having a local or state law enacted as a result of the complaint, with possible sanctions through fines and forcing them to comply with the minor ban.4. According to Barry's Rules, the action with the least harm would be to ban minors under 18 after 9pm. They would have to consider the effect a potential lawsuit would have on their image, and this ban only affects several stores, so the financial impact is not expected to be as rough as expected.5. It is more important to respect the community's calls and prevent any legal problems by circumventing the ban. Hooters wants to remain a neighborhood restaurant and will continue to serve those under 18 before 21:00.