In today's worldview, men and women have been seen as two separate beings both physically and psychologically (Lorber, 725). The internal and external mapping of bodies remains unchanged for centuries. The only variables are the justifications for gender inequality. Many people are familiar with the common comparison between both sexes in sports, personal situations and workplaces based simply on physiological or biological aspects. Overall differences determine separate genres that would not prevail without a culture that causes divisions, groupings and categories. In Judith Lober's work, she passionately delves into the issue of gender inequality by emphasizing how it all begins with basic physiological differences and the way society transforms those dissimilarities into sociopolitical ones from a biological aspect (Lorber, 733).Say no to plagiarism . Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This essay delves into Lober's persuasive literature that presents statistical evidence, research-based assessments, and his take on the gender issues facing people across the country every day in the fight for gender equality. Judith Lober is one of the most widely read gender theorists in the modern world and this is consolidated by her role as a professor at the City University of New York and Brooklyn College, where she teaches women's studies and sociology. Lober's decision to write about gender inequality is supported by her educational background. She has written a couple of books, including: Gender Inequality: Feminist Theory and Politics: Degendering and Feminist Change and Paradoxes (Evans, 24). Lober has received a couple of awards for his constant enlightenment on issues related to gender inequality. In the lecture given by Lober, there were no particular events that inspired his literature, but his inspiration occurred through a chain of situations and events he needed to convey thoughtfulness to his listeners. The requirement was that there was or exists a socially based prerequisite for dividing people. Lober's literature clearly presents and discusses the specific inescapable reality that women and men are divided into female and male simply based on bodily variations (Lorber, 732). The creation of these two categories leads to stigmas that hold these genders back and dictate the roles and responsibilities they must perform. Lober believes these are cultural creations that lead to division through rules enacted by generations of social influence. Lober's extensive research and her involvement in the feminist and socialist world allowed her to carry out in-depth studies and led to an evolutionary understanding of the inner workings of society and to reach a convincing conclusion that inspired her lecture. We can assume that the audience to which the lecture was given included a couple of students, graduates, faculty, and intrigued members of Brooklyn College. Nowadays, the audience has evolved and involved many readers, from academic writing to an investigation, as well as Judith Lober's book. followers. Through her intellectual abilities and as a professor, her intentions were brought to the attention of her readers and inspired change in society. On the other hand, it is clear that Lober wants to meet his skeptics when he states: “I am not saying that there are no physical variations between the male and female bodies, but these differences are socially meaningless until social practices transform them Indeed". (Lober, 731). This statement not only provokes reflection among skeptics and readers, buthe also approaches the topic with a valid argument that strongly supports every statement Lober makes during his lecture. In Lober's transcribed speech, there is a lot of persuasive material that tries to persuade the audience with the use of rhetorical methods. The way he conveys valuable information with a normal ease that commendably influences the reader (Evans, 76). Building on Lober's ethos, she is empowered to provide in-depth and substantive information due to her background in gender studies and her ongoing involvement in the socialist and gender equality movement. Its coherent content is supported by studies, interviews and statistical data. For example, in its open status, it provides a historical background of the creation and growth of power that divided the two sexes (Lorber 732). Scientific studies and discoveries subsequently created modern excuses for society to produce variations that presented greater difficulties for women, and these powers were created by men. In further research, Lober presented an interview with six medical specialists conducted by Suzanne Kelser in 1990 (Lober, 727). In that study, it was found that children were classified as male or female depending on the size of their penis. It is unfortunate that many of the existing physiological attributes are the determinants of gender and this gives society the opportunity to divide both sexes according to their physical characteristics. The same criteria are used in the Olympic Games where each partition is based on the existing natal factor of athletic ability and genetic material. Lober's application of pathos helps her connect with her listeners and readers, as well as her studies in many ways. Being a woman, it is clear that she has first-hand experience with issues of sexism and gender discrimination. As an educated professor and renowned scholar, one can easily guarantee that she has experienced her share of skeptics and doubters who have only acted as building blocks for her esteemed opinion and research. On the other hand, Lober uses the word “we” in the concluding remarks of his lecture so as to connect with his followers and the audience (Lober, 733). The intentional association with the audience causes her to be on the same level as them, rather than being superior. Her association with the public makes her part of the cultural stigma and automatically includes her as part of the society. During his lecture, he provides undeniable facts and studies on issues of gender inequality, Lober emphasizes to his listeners that as a culture there is a tendency to group things and people into defined groups. This divide is evident across religious affiliations, ethnic groups, genders, and educational backgrounds. Regardless of the truth of existing biological differences, it is socially “right” to highlight those differences and then deliver a farewell that not only lacks understanding and acceptance, but causes dangerous generalizations regarding each gender's conventional desires, attitudes, and behaviors. The issue of female inequality is not, and has not long existed, only a female issue (Evans, 88). Males are trapped by social stigmas like females. On the contrary, this stigma does not arise from the division of the financial situation that exists between them and the workplace. Society expects men to be the breadwinner and to be masculine and possess the power that allows them to not only harm women but also inflict self-harm. It is therefore wise for these men to step in and take part in this change. Lober states that “when we rely on conventional categories of sex and gender, we end up finding what we were looking for: we see what we believe, whether “female” and?”