Peace is generally always considered to be a direct result of war. However, this will not always be the case. By evaluating two case studies, namely the Bangladesh Liberation War and the Persian Gulf War, through the analysis of sources, it can be seen that sometimes war does not end peacefully. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Let's look at the Bangladesh Liberation War. To simply summarize this event, it was, as the name suggests, a struggle for the freedom of Bangladesh from Pakistan, then known as East Pakistan and West Pakistan respectively, which began in March 1971 and ended with Pakistan's surrender. in December 1971. Since the object of this war was Bangladesh, to evaluate whether peace was achieved after the Bangladesh Liberation War, we must analyze the sources addressing the state of Bangladesh in the months and years following the war. The first source that will be analyzed is an article taken from the Encyclopedia Britannica website entitled “Bangladesh since Independence”. It presents a third-person perspective on major events in Bangladesh from 1972 to 2010. It states that “[in] January 1972,” a month after Pakistan's surrender, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was “installed as the first prime minister of the new parliamentary government of Bangladesh”. However, on August 15, 1975, “he was murdered along with most of his family.” The source claims that "right-wing pro-Pakistan army officers were behind the murder" and "some politicians were involved in the conspiracy". The source also claims that there were “paramilitary forces, known as Razakar, who supported the Pakistani cause.” These troops killed many Urdu speakers, who were the minority. So, from this source, it can be seen that in the aftermath of the Bangladesh Liberation War, chaos and bloodshed were prevalent, not peace. Encyclopedia Britannica is a verified general knowledge encyclopedia, and its articles are written by a team of editors and experts, and all changes made to its online site, from which I found this article, are reviewed and checked several times before to be approved by the professional staff of the Encyclopedia Britannica. This source was also written after the conclusion of the conflicts by a third party for educational purposes only, so, based on the context, it should be a reliable source. So, this article is reliable. The second source is an article published on a Bangladeshi development studies website on September 5, 2011. It also presents a third-person perspective and discusses the state Bangladesh was in after the war, from 1972 to 1975. This source also states that after gaining sovereignty, Bangladesh was ruled by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Furthermore, it provides further information that “the higher authorities depended on the anti-liberation elite class,” so they “intentionally misled [Mujibur and his government] and made them unpopular in a very short time.” This source also reinforces the fact that “[in August 1975, Mujibur and most of his family members were murdered by… pro-Pakistan army officers.” From this source it is therefore also clear that peace in Bangladesh was not achieved in the years following the Liberation War. However, this article, unlike the previous source, was not written by a group of experts. It was written by a man named Shuza Uddin, who I didn't find much about other than the fact that he graduated from the Dhaka University of International Relations in Bangladesh. He also seemed to have quotedonly Wikipedia as source. Therefore, the reliability of an article written by him is questionable. Also, since Shuza Uddin is originally from Bangladesh, he may have exaggerated the source information. Therefore, this source is not entirely reliable. We then study the Gulf War, or as it is sometimes called, the Gulf War.Persian Gulf War. In August 1990, Iraq, under the government of Saddam Hussein, invaded neighboring Kuwait. On November 29, 1990, the United Nations Security Council authorized the use of military force against Iraq if it did not withdraw from Kuwait by January 15. When Saddam Hussein did not comply, United Nations forces, known as Operation Desert Storm, swung into action and war broke out. out. The war lasted until February 28 of that year, when US President George HW Bush declared a ceasefire. Since the object of this war was the Gulf region, to evaluate whether peace was achieved after the Gulf War, we must analyze the sources that refer to the situation in the region in the months and years following the war, especially in Iraq. The first The source that will be analyzed is an article titled “Persian Gulf War” on the History Channel website. Issues before, during and after the war are discussed, but only the post-war situation will be studied. The source states that "in the immediate aftermath of the war, Saddam Hussein's forces brutally suppressed uprisings by Kurds in northern Iraq and Shiites in the south." It also states that Iraqi forces regularly “exchanged fire with US and British aircraft” while “patrolling and enforcing a no-fly zone” over Iraq. Furthermore, the source highlights the fact that "the United States issued an ultimatum on March 17, 2003 demanding that Saddam Hussein resign from power and leave Iraq within 48 hours" without prior consultation with the UN, which Hussein refused . This led to the outbreak of the Iraq War three days later. So, since there was a clear presence of conflict in Iraq in the aftermath of the Gulf War, it can be seen that peace was not achieved. The articles on the History Channel website, just like the episodes broadcast worldwide on the channel itself, are written and vetted by a team of experts and professional historians, and the History Channel has been recognized by audiences globally as one of the sources of more reliable historical information in the media. Furthermore, the information in the source was written long after the end of the war and for educational purposes only, although the History Channel is an American television network and America was one of the key players in the Gulf War and its aftermath. It is therefore a reliable source. The second source that will be studied is the front page of an issue of the Bangor Daily News, an American newspaper. It was published on Tuesday, March 20, 2003, the day the war in Iraq began. The headline reads “It's War” and the subtitle reads “US Launches Surgical Strike on Iraq.” This proves that war has broken out. One of the article headlines in the issue also reads: “US Seeks to Knock Out Saddam's Protectors.” From these lines it can be seen that, following the consequences of the Gulf War and the hatred that the United States had for the leadership of Saddam Hussein, the United States of America had declared war on Iraq. The cover story's headline also reads “Bush: 'No Results But Victory,'” showing the enormous resentment the United States had for Saddam and, at the same time, foreshadowing the amount of bloodshed this war will cause. So, since the Gulf War led to another war, it is clear that peace has not been achieved. Here.