IndexIntroductionCharacter Analysis of Ma JoadCharacter Analysis of Rose of SharonConclusionIntroductionJohn Steinbeck's novel, "The Grapes of Wrath", published in 1939, serves as a profound exploration of the evolving dynamics of genre during the tumultuous decade of the Great Depression. Steinbeck, a proletarian novelist deeply influenced by his personal experiences during this era, deftly illuminates transformative changes in traditional gender roles. While vividly depicting the harsh realities of the Depression through his well-drawn characters, Steinbeck also captures the spirit of growing female independence. This essay delves into the portrayal of gender roles in the novel during the 1930s, highlighting that being a domestic mother served a crucial function for survival and that male roles were no more significant than female ones. By closely examining female characters Ma Joad and Rose of Sharon and drawing insights from literary critics like Jenn Williamson and Mimi Gladstein, we reveal the novel's deep focus on gender roles and its critique of their destruction amid the transformative upheaval of the Dust Bowl . plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Character Analysis of Ma Joad Faced with the traditional patriarchal system, Ma Joad emerges as a formidable force within the narrative, holding the family firmly together throughout their arduous journey. Interestingly, although the men in the family grow weaker as the journey progresses, the female characters become stronger. Initially, Ma Joad embodies the submissive wife archetype, adhering to the traditional feminine role with unswerving loyalty to her husband, Pa. At the beginning of the story, she refrains from freely expressing her thoughts or doubts, often waiting for a signal to do so . speak, embodying the submissive and passive female ideal of her time. Steinbeck skillfully constructs an image of Ma Joad as the quintessential caring mother, initially limited to the roles of wife and caretaker. She is described as “a mother who cares for everyone” (Gladstein 1986, 77), exemplified by her altruistic act of sharing meager rations with strangers due to her maternal instincts. Ma Joad's submissive role towards the male characters is evident when Tom, returning from prison with Casey, raises questions about whether to join the family's trip to California. He turns to Tom to talk, respecting his role as a man, even if he has his own opinion. He states, "Why, we would be proud to have you. Of course I can't say it at this time [...] perhaps it's best not to say it until all the men come" (Steinbeck 127). Despite her underlying thoughts, she submits to male authority, embodying the traditional gender norms of her time. However, as the story progresses, there is a noticeable change in Ma Joad's behavior. When the male figures engage in a discussion circle, she boldly expresses her thoughts, shaking her husband with her assertive tone: "I never heard of any Joad [...] who ever refused food, shelter or a pass on the road to anyone." Her assertiveness pushes the male figures to await her return to the circle, a sign of newfound respect for the female perspective. This moment marks a turning point in Ma's role within the family, as she gains a voice in decision-making. Another crucial moment in the challenge to traditional gender roles occurs when Ma, unlike before, does not seek approval before expressing her opinion. Thisaccident unfolds in front of everyone when their car breaks down and Casey and Tom decide to stay to fix it. The mother confronts her husband and the entire group witnesses her rebellion. Steinbeck vividly portrays the tension as "The whole group watched the riot. They watched Pa, waiting for him to break out in fury [...] the group knew Ma had one. And Ma knew it too" (Steinbeck 230). Determination to keep her family together and secure, guided by her maternal instincts, forces her to speak out despite the potential reaction of her husband, who appears weakened by changing circumstances. Initially aware of her importance in the family, Ma follows the hierarchical system, but as Gladstein notes, "her character emerges from the book much more than Mother Earth" (Gladstein 78). Ma Joad's detailed characterization highlights her significance in the family and challenges the prevailing perception of women during the Depression. Steinbeck skillfully portrays Ma Joad as a multifaceted character, thus presenting a modern view of women's ability to multitask and lead in times of trouble. Character Analysis of Rose of Sharon Rose of Sharon's character undergoes a significant transformation in contrast to Ma Joad, who consistently displays strength and leadership. At the beginning of the novel, Rose appears self-centered, displaying a lack of affection for her unborn child and reluctance to assist Ma with household chores, similar to Ma's evolving role as the family's leader. However, as the story progresses, Rose gradually matures. Ma takes on the responsibility of raising Rose's daughter and guiding her through motherhood, but Rose initially resents these efforts and uses her status as a respected mother to her advantage, seeking protection. In the early stages of their journey, gender roles remain strictly defined, as illustrated when Uncle John, despite his age, is preferred to Rose to sit next to the driver: "If he hadn't been fifty, and then one of the natural rulers of the family, Uncle John would have preferred not to sit in the seat of honor next to the driver. He would have liked Rose of Sharon to sit there because she was young and she was a woman” (Steinbeck 130). highlights the initial adherence to traditional gender roles within the Joad family. The character of Rose of Sharon is initially depicted as submissive, living solely for her husband's dreams, devoid of personal ambition. She appears helpless and highly dependent on her husband, but when he abandons her, she finds herself in a vulnerable state. This loss triggers a transformation in her character, leading her to a greater sensitivity towards the unborn child and a newfound willingness to contribute to the family unit, particularly under Ma's guidance. This transformation is subtly reflected in the narrative, as she she evolves from being called "girl" to "woman" in the novel's conclusion. The novel's controversial ending depicts Rose breastfeeding a hungry man, a symbolic act of compassion and hope. This scene challenges traditional gender roles and reflects Steinbeck's modern perspective. The novel ends with the image of two women, evoking optimism in the face of adversity. This depiction reinforces the idea that women, through Steinbeck's lens, are resilient and adaptable, capable of facing life's challenges head on. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion Throughout the novel, Steinbeck highlights the changing power dynamics between men and women during the 1930s. While the men are weakened by the loss of their land and the ability to., 33(2), 199-221.