This lecture was very interesting, but at the same time it didn't confuse me much. I read further literature to develop my opinion on this topic. I found Descartes' expressions on God, man and the soul very interesting. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe only existence I am quite sure of is my own, that is, the existence of my spirit, my soul, and my thoughts, while the being of the entire material world (and my own body) remains in doubt. We do not have conclusive data that confirms the truth of our sensations. It can only be the result of our imagination. However, according to Descartes' philosophy, there is one of our ideas that we could not create on our own, which we must rather recognize as given to us, since it contains a more complete reality than we find in ourselves. And I agree with Descartes that this is the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bGod - the most perfect being, a limitless being, directly opposed to the sense of limitation of our own being and therefore inspired by God himself, inherent in us before any experience , like the idea we have about ourselves. It was very interesting to see how we can apply philosophy to politics. For the first time I found myself faced with the term Political Philosophy. Thomas Hobbes played an important role in establishing political philosophy. Thomas Hobbes defended the idea of ​​the asociality of the person, that man by nature is not a social being, because, from his point of view, "... civil societies are not simple assemblies, but alliances for the creation of what treaties and loyalty are necessary." necessary." To form a civil society, "natural sociality" is not enough. We should look more carefully at Hobbes' position; it expresses the radicality of the Hobbesian model of the natural state. In the natural state the person is free in the sense that any act will be considered unfair to anyone, because in a natural state there are neither civil nor "divine" laws. In such a natural state, it is simply impossible neither to sin against God, nor to commit crimes From the point of view of T. Hobbes, when you establishes the institution of the state, people sacrifice their natural rights, and from the moment of its establishment only the state is considered the only person authorized to solve the problem of preserving society, its stability and tranquility. Hobbes formulates the main goal of the state: to protect the life and property of members of society, using for this purpose the means that the state deems necessary. According to the theoretical construction of T. Hobbes, the state is endowed with unlimited powers in achieving of its goal. It has no control by civil society since the conditions for the creation of a state, starting from the natural state, involve the refusal of people from the rights of this state and their transfer to the state. Therefore, the natural state right - the right to do anything for the sake of self-preservation - is acquired by the State and is henceforth only authorized to decide what is good for people and what is bad for the preservation of their lives and property. . Furthermore, the contract is concluded only between citizens, while the government is not the subject of the contract process and, therefore, has no legal responsibility. It is no coincidence that his main political-juridical treatise is called "Leviathan". To describe the essence of the state, he uses the image of the biblical monster Leviathan, which devours people. After watching the video "The Age of Reason" from the second part of our conference, I realized how much this period was.