The world speaks the same language, this is the title of my report. I think what happens is that we all speak the same language? what could happen if they spoke the same language? What would change if we spoke the same language? , why don't we speak the same language? , I think if they want to answer this question what is the answer and what happened, why Allah made us speak another language, in this report I want to explain what is useful if they speak the same language and what is a mistake if they speak the same same language do you speak another language? and why humans kill people because they speak another language. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay A world speaking the same language: What happened when all the people in the world spoke the same language, or why all the people on the same word did not speak the same language? , and what can we do so that all people in the world speak the same language There are approximately 7.5 billion people on the third rock from the Sun. That's 7,500,000,000 individual names, 15,000,000,000 years and 150,000,000,000 phalanges (more or less a couple of hundred... million?). The Earth has a surface area of ​​148,326,000 square kilometers above sea level and is divided into 7 continents which are home to 196 different countries. These 196 countries, with their 7.5 billion citizens, use approximately 7,000 languages. About 6% of these languages ​​represent the native language of 94% of the population – 50% of the languages ​​are spoken by fewer than 10,000 people and 25% are spoken by fewer than 1,000 people. Given the great complexity of human life spread across the world, we are actually quite united linguistically. But as we enter the 21st century, are we moving closer to linguistic solidarity? What would happen if every human understood a single language? According to the Bible, this has already happened. Long ago, after the Great Flood, humanity was united under one common language. Apparently, this leads to an enormous increase in productivity, the result of which must have been so magnificent that God Himself intervened: “And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower whose top is in the sky; let us make a name for ourselves, so as not to be scattered throughout the earth." But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. the people are one and all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now they will not be denied what they intend to do. Come, let us go down and there we will confuse their language, so that they do not understand the speeches of others." Then the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth. , and they stopped building the city. Therefore he called it Babel because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth, and from there the Lord scattered them over the face of all the earth." And according to the Quran an Allah said "(O people, We have created you from male and female and We have made known to you peoples and tribes to know that your honor with God Ikakm that God knows the expert(13) Surah Al-KharatThe people of the tribe of the tribes are evil and Adnan, while the tribe is the division of the people , and some of them said: The people who belong to the land, while the tribe is attributed to their origin. Others said: The people are non-Arab tribes this division, which begins with the unity of the family and then expands to clan and then to the thigh and abdomen until reaching the architecture and the tribe and then the people, was not in vain, but for the purpose of knowledge making up for lost time on the logic of God, it is clear that this story alludes to possibilities that open up The point where dialect will never again be a border should communicate: today's man may not need to build A giant flood-proof tower, Well thatA space elevator may not be crazy about the address. Those perfect of the same dialect believe that thought vindicates united human cooperation. Without it, it will no longer be difficult to complete the fills, in any case you should then rewrite the fill to what's more, right?. It is predicted that by 2100, more than half of the more than 7,000 dialects spoken on earth may cease to exist. Alongside these dialects, the exceptional history, the culture, the perspective, and moreover the personality card, will disappear. There will certainly be a value to be paid for an even more global social order. However, when these dialects fade away, those numbers will not. A recent study estimated that eventually, looking at Tom's 2100, the globe number could reach a secondary value of 12.3 billion – a 64% expansion over the course of the century. Know from the statement that this relative will have a dialect to speak with if you stop offering what now exists alternatively could be a new optional language and a groove made for what is to come worldwide, topic about the world. As stated by those Guardian, on a particular case study conducted by teacher James Foreman-Peck of the UK Branch for Business, improved skills and poor dialect aptitudes have pampered the £48 billion economy (75, 6 billion dollars) per year, or 3.5% of GDP. The inability to provide complete information is particularly harmful to small and medium-sized exporters who are unable to manage those semantic masters used by larger organizations. Exporting organizations looking for universal opportunities saw dialects As for the example One noteworthy limitation, at the same time 70% of exporters did not need any knowledge of foreign languages ​​in the countries where they work. Opportunity could be wasted. An alternative approach would consider budgetary expenditures resulting from communication problems. For example, in the United States, last year's GDP would have been $17.41 trillion. Starting from those who discovered that poor language skills cost 3.5% of the average GDP, this means that we have wasted around 600 billion dollars. period relating to 2014 only. Oh. This is a considerable measure from claiming the money. In fact, that's about the same amount of money our government uses for its military every year: 16% of the national plan. Dialect may not be the best way we express ourselves, but it also influences the way we see the world. Economist Keith Chen observed how tense future contrasts affected how the speaker thinks about what's to come. He discovered that dialects with a weak tense future were only the tip of the iceberg which is answered something like organizing what is to come: they use less, smoke less, and also fill more. An example from the statement of how the future tense camwood differs: in Mandara, you might say "I'll try the films this weekend" (weak future tense) while for English you might say "I'll try the films this weekend" (strong future tense) . As the Atlantic ran it alongside an article regarding Chen's article, "He asked whether dialects with weak future tenses might have a chance to be more careful about what's to come, resulting in them thinking of us, grammatically, the same of the exhibition." Arrangements made by eBay A generally interesting feature that summarizes the article: Those are on the series. Of course, no one knows if people think this way because of their language, or if their dialect could be that way essentially since it reflects how individuals imagine. However,Chen's article reveals that language will be deeply tied to how people see the world, which becomes dependent on such inquiry:Assuming that we all speak the same language, could we give up differences for thought? could we begin to see that planet in the same way until the end? Romanian scholar Emil Cioran once said: “When I transformed my language, I demolished my secret word. I turned my whole into an aggregation. ” This New York Times article digs beneath that idea, saying, “For a writer's language, far from being a consistently meaningless method of expression it will be above all a way of claiming a subjective presence and an approach to encountering the world.” It needs dialect not recently to represent things, and to see them. The world is safely discovered by the Japanese writer, and many of you have stopped offering to the one who composes to finish. A writer's dialect is not exactly something he uses, yet it is constitutive and unique. This may be why you should abandon your local language and common groove. Also, should you embrace another, you may dismantle yourself, but eventually Tom's reading piece, etc., will put you back together, side by side with an alternative type. ". That article goes on to say, "For starters, as dialects evolve, you become ground zero of your presence. There must be the possibility that there is a significant moment, however brief, when you stop. ” That's a little dramatic, but there's a percentage of truth there. After we start speaking, dialect gains an important perspective on who we are. It's how we identify with that world, and it's also how we were ready to fill the gaps and, above all, produce civilization. It is an immense and unique aggregate personality and our distinctive identity, also it needs capable impact on the way we think. When we discover another language, we will take away the safe place on our local dialect. Recently, I may have been conquered along with Ecuador in the company of the crew. My Spanish is terrible. Exceptionally terrible. Also, when I'm broadcasting for someone who needs equally bad English, I've realized that broadcasting to a broken speech only ever takes away from who I am. I can't joke or express complex considerations. I am not insensitive to advanced cell phones. I say things like, “I'm going to try shopping right now. ” My customization is generally absent in that discussion. Something that we underestimate – the fundamental correspondence – ends up creating nervousness, embarrassment, and also takes away the certainty that we are An and only who we are. When I deliver a broken speech, I have stripped away everything that makes me, me. The correspondence is driven towards a single motive and what's more nothing. By the way, of course, the huge address constantly goes to: what dialect will it be? could it be English, Chinese, Spanish or another language? Assuming Tom is ultimately reading Occam's Razor, English will be a pretty safe guess. Chinese dialects are out of the question, most ordinary people, however, rarely talk about China abroad (except for expats who read Tom). English can be spoken throughout the world, and is also used as a basic dialect in large numbers fields, including in science. technology, world relations (it's an authoritarian dialect of yet another EU), the air force and navy and of course the American popular society which achieves a lot. Also large, much appreciated by Hollywood. However, since dialect is related to culture, English greets for a rich history, moreover, anyone who adopts it As for the illustration A dialectit begins with an embrace of that society. Most likely many people could be sure of this: they would not need to be forced to embrace a remote culture, and besides, who could be blamed on them? Given the history of England and American imperialism, help is needed for numerous people around the world who may feel that English is our only dialect and is just an alternative to trying to force society to surround others who need have nothing to do with it. English must be said if the opportunity to be notoriously harsh gets a result that could be overflowing with spelling, pronunciation and furthermore very strange of people's idioms. At the same time, English may not be the perfect language in the whole world, it may become a special case essentially due to pragmatism: moss oak individuals force the impulse to learn a second dialect. The possibilities that accompany speaking English, despite its difficulties, currently outweigh a significant number of other decisions. If we cannot choose which dialect “wins” (and for heaven's sake it could easily consolidate before we have done so) a further The choice will be to make another language, destined to be spoken towards the whole world, detached from any company or unique personality card. A protected alternative language could allow a significant part of the profits of a widespread speech without those passing through social inheritance. There is such a dialect. Esperanto is a constructed world dialect created in 1887. Esperanto may have been designed to be easy to learn and also politically impartial, making it a perfect candidate for an auxiliary dialect. Esperanto currently needs an average of 100,000-2,000,000 familiar speakers and around 1,000 local speakers (it is in fact on Google Translate!). At the same time, Esperanto does not need something like a fire, it must develop incessantly. Assuming anything, it will be a vision of the future. What more supports the world unification model. If it is difficult for the people of the world to speak in a unified language, do people come together to use a single body language for the physical? expression in question without the use of verbal language? Answer: No. For example, the tag "admiration" on Facebook, which is widely distributed around the world, has different connotations. Just as it expresses "admiration" and "that's fine", the same sign expresses bad and degrading connotations when used in countries such as Italy, Russia, Australia, Greece, the Philippines, West Africa and Iraq. One of the experiences that The divergence between the indications of this reference is that the American soldiers during the invasion of Iraq were some Iraqis waving that sign, and initially the Americans thought it was a sign of their support for the Iraqis, but it became discovered that the Iraqis actually intended to highlight the looting and abuse of US soldiers. Language is so deeply ingrained in nearly every aspect of how we interact with the world that it's hard to imagine what it would be like not to have it. What if we didn't have names for things? What if we have no experience making statements, asking questions, or talking about things that didn't actually happen? Would we be able to think? What would our thoughts be like? The answer to the question of whether thought is possible without language depends on what is meant by thought. Can we experience sensations, impressions, feelings without language? Yes, and very few would argue otherwise. But there is a difference between being able to experience, for example, pain or light, and possessing the concepts of "pain" and "light". Many.