IndexIntroductionDefinitionsArguments and analysisConclusionIntroductionLeadership is mostly exercised by one person (the leader), which for some people makes it unfair, due to language differences, increase in level, etc. differences occur in a society or a country, but what if that society is or is led by all or a group of people, this somehow raises the hopes of the people that since it is led by in a group in some This way there is a greater chance of being heard and understood, they will have their representatives to give voice even if there are differences in language, religion, etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Communications needed to manage a team, a company or even a country. It is necessary to understand every point offered by people so that in the end everyone agrees on something, this is called consensus. According to Merriam Webster, it is a general agreement, and this agreement is made or decided by a group of people, it is called democracy, when put together they are called consensual democracy, which means that the decision is made and agreed upon mainly by all people. , their participation made them part of society, of the country. In this article I will discuss and demonstrate how consensus-based democracy reduces social inequality, but first let me define the words you are familiar with. Definitions According to Audiopedia (2017), Consensual democracy is an important feature of political culture to prevent domination. Consensus democracy has really helped or could help a country or society to have everyone's approval. And as discussed above, it increases the possibility of citizen participation when it comes to decision-making. Having the approval of the majority of people on something because of the person they are rooting for is in that group who could express their concerns creates unity on something. But there are disadvantages in consensual democracy because, given the presence of several people leading the country or society, it is difficult to decide something. Decisions and solutions on something took longer than expected because they had a group of people to lead, too many brains and ideas is really a good thing, too many perspectives to consider is somehow what citizens want, but if it takes a simple problem to solve takes too long because many considerations would need to be made that could lead to another problem, it's like watering the tree to expand or make many branches. According to the Genealogy of Consensus (1970), consensus democracy could be regarded as a "true" one. democracy,” quote “decisions are not made by majority vote but rather through extensive deliberation on decisions to which everyone agrees.” the point of this statement is that the people in the group that leads the country or society study the situation and decide whether what to do about the problem or issue or how they should handle that problem to be able to solve it. According to Linder, W. (1970): “I find it right that all languages, all regions and political parties should be represented in the government”. Due to the fact that several people lead the country or society, this helped people to be calm and impartial when it comes to the agreement because their concerns were heard and discussed by the group whatever their language or from which region come, as long as they have expressed their concerns and ideas that contribute and benefit politicians to have options to solve problems at.