Harris" while defendant Harris refused permission to search his car, the sniffer dog alerted the officer in charge of the controlled substance in the car door handle representing a probable cause ( Constitution Daily, Folrida v. Harris). Keeping the previous three cases in mind, it can be concluded that the Fourth Amendment is as easy to violate as it protects citizens to question the Fourth Amendment along with racial profiling important that has maintained the controversy over "unreasonable search and seizure" is the use of GPS surveillance on a suspicious vehicle "United States v. Jones", the case in which the judge ruled the evidence obtained was usurped by Jones, therefore not acceptable in court. Jones was arrested using GPS to track his activity for a month, without the judge's approval (Body Politic, United States v. Jones as the Fourth Amendment provides protection for search). and trespassing, the method was a direct violation of constitutional law, and Jones was cleared of all charges. Although Jones was found to be in possession of drugs and should be behind bars, officials should have followed proper protocol to lawfully arrest him. People like Jones should be punished, but being protected by the constitution the correct procedure must be