With the United Nations deeming health care a natural right and the rising cost of health care, America has entered a questionable crisis. Even having insurance is a struggle for most families. In many other countries, healthcare is controlled by the government and all citizens are provided with government-assisted healthcare. Most systems in Europe are in fact controlled by the government and are taxed on my wages. In contrast, the U.S. government does not pay for health care for most of its citizens. If you're lucky enough to afford insurance, it's usually through your employer. By comparison, nearly all government-run insurance provides better care for newborns and pregnant mothers than the U.S. healthcare system. However, the US system is more flexible than government-subsidized systems. The problem in America is the health crisis. We all fear the government running programs and operations, so we are all reluctant to allow this government-subsidized system into our nation. We all wonder how we spend the most money on healthcare than any other nation and our quality of care is not as high as other nations. Our healthcare costs are projected to rise to $4 trillion next year. The quality of healthcare still remains low. In the United States, there is a large number of people who have no insurance. There are also people who pay ridiculous prices for insurance, all of which has created a modern crisis and a hotly debated topic in America. Like any crisis in the United States, people are trying to solve it. One method is the single player system. This system requires the government to pay for doctors and hospital visits. The… half of the paper… they spend on heroic medicines, which can alleviate much physical pain and suffering, with a substantial impairment of quality of life on the other end, at best. The insurer should be 100% free to offer the patient as much of the savings as possible. The patient must be completely free to make this decision, without any power in the hands of the insurance company to enforce it. On the other hand, giving the patient the option to weigh the expenses versus the benefits and make that decision about their health care would be morally incorrect. Indeed, only the patient can justify the morality in the situation that makes this difficult. decision for himself, rather than the bureaucracy of some government or third-party insurance company. Furthermore, basic economic logic tells people that someone should make this decision.