In today's world, the interdependence between states, organizations and people is increasing. By facilitating the growth of both cooperation and conflict, the effects of this globalization can be clearly highlighted. Some believe that global integration accelerates the creation of universal authority, while others highlight the proliferation and emerging influence of non-state actors, such as the WHO, Apple or the EU. The third quote can be associated with the previous liberal perspective, as global governance, involving intense collaboration, is seen as essential and adequate to address emerging universal tribulations. This recognition of the complexity and broad scope of the dynamic problems accompanying globalization is entirely accurate, as is the compulsion towards a form of transnational action; however, a global government is not expected in the near future. Rather, the legitimacy and functions of non-governmental organizations are likely to increase, and the roles of sovereign states and intergovernmental organizations will be forced to transform dramatically. In the context of regime theory, it can be concluded that non-governmental organizations, intergovernmental organizations and multinational corporations will be very relevant in the near future, replacing the role of states in the form of international cooperation. Dilemmas involving the environment and the economy are two of the most compelling factors in international political relations between states. Ironically, these problems also confirm the growing importance of non-governmental organizations. The consequences of environmental damage highlight the collective action problem, also known as the “tragedy of the commons.” While self-interest is one… middle of paper… an influence of intergovernmental organizations, while myriad multinational corporations and non-governmental organizations vividly color the landscape of international cooperation with the opportunity to address modern issues with innovative and relevant methods, not available in the conventional state. However, states' powers may expand into areas of traditional state aptitude, but non-governmental organizations are likely to compensate elsewhere. With this evidence, it can be concluded that the Westphalian system will only continue with drastic changes to the concept of sovereignty, reform of the procedures and organizations used by governments to fulfill obligations, and increased influence and accountability of non-governmental actors. Only the future will provide the details of this evolving system and its effects on the world's inhabitants.