He also developed the idea that people could not earn more by attending college education based on the above facts. Then, he wrote about the example of a person who graduated from college and was unable to find a job. The person borrows money to earn a master's degree. But the best job was a $3,000 job that lasted three months. Now he has become a track driver. Here he first used logos, i.e. data, and used an example such as pathos which could have made his argument more powerful. Combined with shocking data, it made his argument very strong. Continuing this, he said that the presentations on the brochure are absolutely not the same as the real ones. In its seventh paragraph, the term "university is a business" was stated and shows that students are only a cost item and that professors can only live here on the research money earned for the school. Here he used strong ethics and let the public lose the trust of colleges greatly. In the following paragraphs, he demonstrated that many students are dissatisfied with school, which means failing the exam and failing to learn something necessary from UCLA's evolving ideas and data. Finally he stated what we, especially parents, could do when governments do not punish but reward