Euthanasia, a Greek word for "good death" refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. Passive and active euthanasia is a very controversial topic that has been addressed by many people. Authors James Rachels and Thomas D. Sullivan make opposing arguments about the permissibility of both passive and active euthanasia. Using the case of a child with Down syndrome, James Rachels argues that passive euthanasia can in some cases be morally indistinguishable from active euthanasia and in other cases even worse. In contrast, Thomas D. Sullivan opposes Rachel's claims by arguing that the real distinction arises from the traditional view, according to which the intentional termination of human life is impermissible regardless of whether this goal is achieved by action or inaction. He holds that when one withholds the means to sustain life it is equivalent to killing. However, instead of arguing about the distinctions of euthanasia, many people base their arguments on whether or not euthanasia as a whole should be allowed in society. There is a serious distinction between passive and active euthanasia, that is, killing and letting die. Passive and active euthanasia have separate contributions but both in specific cases can be not only permissible but also useful for a patient. Passive euthanasia is generally more morally permissible than active euthanasia although, in certain circumstances, active euthanasia may also be considered permissible. Although for different reasons John Rachels and Thomas D. Sullivan both conclude that passive and active euthanasia are impermissible. When you think of killing, you think of a definite action that results in death. While… in the middle of the paper… to the questions raised above, some people will argue yes. Those against euthanasia might argue that it is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. Therefore, suggesting that doing or not doing to prolong your life somehow demonstrates that you value life less. This is not necessarily true. Even considering euthanasia means that the situation has already reached the extremes. As described above, most cases requiring the option of euthanasia leave the affected individual in pain or in a worsened state of being. Refusing to take the risk of giving an individual a treatment that could cause greater harm in no way demonstrates that you place less value on life. Passive euthanasia really means valuing life to let nature take its course without your interference. It is not human nature that everyone dies sooner or later??