Introduction This article explores allegations of selective justice made by the African Union against the International Criminal Court. It argues that the International Criminal Court can contribute effectively to peace and peacebuilding, as long as it involves a comprehensive approach to international justice that goes beyond criminal trials. The argument is strengthened by the use of African case studies where the ICC has not been entirely effective. A solution centered on progressive international restorative justice initiatives is also outlined. African case studies demonstrate a Western-centric bias of the ICC; however, progressive initiatives show a willingness to move forward with international justice and a shift towards a new consciousness. It is imperative that the world recognizes the ICC's potential and exercises patience as its identity and role are established. Key leaders must recognize that the ICC is still in its infancy, having been established in 2002 (ICC, 2011). This is not to say that the ICC is an inherently ineffective or problematic institution, rather, more analysis and collective participation are needed to explore the ICC's potential and goals. This will push the discussion in a more productive direction. This discussion will make clear that justice should extend beyond reactionary punishment and that the dynamic between prosecution and peace is largely understudied (Clark, 2011). significant crimes, for which national courts are unable or unwilling to do so (ICC, 2011). The International Criminal Court establishes itself as a court of last resort designed to complement and strengthen national justice systems. Being an international organization... at the center of the card... fighting. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(2), 127-152.Ocampo, L.M. (2006) Integrating ICC work into local justice initiatives. AmericanUniversity International Law Review, 21(1), 497-503. Rodman, K. (2012). Ethics and international affairs. Ethics and International Affairs, 21(1), 59-71. Scharf, M. P. (1997). Exceptional amnesty to the jurisdiction of the international criminal court. Cornell International Law Journal, 32(1), 507-527. United Nations Human Rights. (1987). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Retrieved from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx Victims' Rights Working Group (2010). Impact of the International Criminal Court on Victims and Affected Communities: A Report of the Victims' Rights Working Group. Retrieved from: http://www.redress.org/Stocktakingreport2010.pdf