Disobedience occurs when the contrast between one's inner beliefs and the norms of society collides. However, it can be seen as a beginning act for an individual. A beginning of an action which has its alliance with Emerson's Transcendentalism. Such transcendentalism in America gradually allows the separation of the individual from the community and pushes man to think in a present and continuous matter choose, perhaps a holy grail to take on in one's life is highlighting how the pursuit of choice gives authority to the self and brings an individual to a state of power Say no to plagiarism Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Don't should they be banned"? Get an original essayIn ". Civil disobedience,” for example, as such an individual alienates himself from an unjust community that accepts slavery and furthermore the Mexican War, sheds light on the realization of the tyranny constituted by the majority. Indeed, for Thoreau, the prevailing agenda coming from the majority, especially from an unjust government, saw itself swallow up individual rights and liberation which culminated in one's conformism. To change this situation, his words offer a preferable and positive leeway that deviates from the existing thoughts that the era inevitably had. Such an example might be: “They take too long and a man's life will be gone. Note: I have other business to take care of. I came into the world not so much to make it a good place to live, but to live in it, for better or for worse. A man has not everything to do, but something; and as he cannot do everything, it is not necessary for him to petition the Governor or the Legislature. . . his very Constitution is evil” Thoreau's argumentative tone uses the personal pronoun “I”. As the reading develops “I” continually represents the importance and meaning in the statements and thoughts of Thoreau (who is an individual). This personal pronoun then echoes its message in meaning an individual's voice and authority. Therefore, a grave act aimed at “making” the world a “good place to live” is condemned as it is an act for change in the external and communal realm. This loses focus on the individual who simply simply wants to “live there”. Therefore, by saying such words, each reader is mobilized so that they too have the meaningful choice not to “do everything” that is apparently created by their own undesirable majority. It offers a choice that a person can simply experience, “for better or for worse.” It is the starting point of an individualism that focuses on the personal scene and conveys to 19th century Americans a choice that they too could perceive. Furthermore, the community “they” describes the voting system of democracy. Therefore, he criticizes how social compliance, or perhaps the only system dictated by the majority, not only consumes inefficient time towards the individual, but leads to unwanted government improvement. This phrase also reflects a more substantial gravity in a person's life than a community act. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom EssayThoreau concludes this by pointing out that “The Constitution is evil” . “Evil” is dramatic, somewhat subjective, but very effective in portraying his dichotomous thoughts. The opposite of such "evil" indicates an active, "choice-sensitive" individual identity that sounds like an ideal of America then and now. Thus, what may have been treated as Thoreau's personal outburst was accepted by the.