In the last section of the article, Milan Hosta returns to his theory of sport. It seems like Hosta comes back to how sports can take over an individual. There is no clear sign that this is what he is saying, but he mentions solipsism. Solipsism is knowing only your own point of view and nothing else matters. It's ethics in sport. You gain an emotional attachment and may not know how to leave it. Sport does not define an individual. There is more to someone than just the sport aspect. Ethics in sports is what creates this attachment. Hosta finishes his article and you don't get any clear point he is trying to make. The author puts a lot of information and difficult choice of words into his article. It also has poor organization, so by the end of this article you won't have enough to choose a side of it