However, Mendoza comes to a compromise as she is the one caught in the middle. For her, it's not about being pro-life or pro-choice, but rather about being in a medical situation that requires abortion. To reach a compromise on both sides, we must frame our laws in such a way that abortions are not so easy to be encouraged. The laws should also be flexible enough so that women who find themselves in Mendoza's situation don't have to wait a few days or go out of state to find a doctor who will perform the procedure. Furthermore, the government can compromise on abortion by trying to eliminate it altogether through the provision of free contraceptives in hospitals, pharmacies or any medical institute. This provision will reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies which are the main cause of abortion. Bottom line, everyone, regardless of whether they are pro-life or pro-choice, needs to have an open mind when it comes to this controversial topic. In cases where abortion is not necessary, for example using the procedure as a contraceptive measure, the mother should not be allowed to abort, however, in cases similar to Mendoza's where termination is unavoidable, the procedure should