This view is consistent with Hope in 2011. He stated that when decision makers or risk managers do a detailed analysis of the problem, the problem is getting worse. If agencies do not adopt timely solutions to control the problem, the problem could cause increasingly greater harm to the environment and human health. Detailed problem analysis is often unnecessary and costly. Since the purpose of risk assessment is to provide sufficient information to decision makers, it is not necessary to provide all information about the problem or risk. This means that decision makers do not need irrelevant information. Analyzing this irrelevant information takes time and money. Regardless of whether the information is relevant or not, analyzing information requires the investment of human and material resources. From a cost perspective, risk assessment requires a firm point, meaning that there is enough information already known for decision makers to make a decision. When the risk assessment reaches this point, the risk assessment process can be stopped. The SFRA method agrees that problem analysis is better at checking rather than analyzing all the details of problems. However, this essay agrees that the evaluation does not need to analyze all the details of the problems. But there are some questions about this stopping point. There is a criterion for?